Hypocritical?
I really must say that at the outset of this movie, I was happy to see someone protesting obscure Newgrounds reviews that do not help the creator of the work improve. However, after the initial 30 seconds or so, as the movie became incredibly boring and repetitive, churning on with no end in site, I realized something: I don't even agree with the premise of the movie.
One of the great things about NG and any website or forum that allows people to freely critique, judge, and review the works of others is the freedom of voice that it gives those that use it. Whether reviews are based on personal opinions, moral and artistic values, or other aspects of a work, they are the product of free minds from all walks of life. When you submit movies to NG, you are submitting it to an open forum. Surely, many will enjoy your work. However, perhaps some reviewers will rip into your movie like a pack of wild dogs, but that is to be expected. It is a cold, harsh world out there.
Does this make it all the more difficult for the artist to please his or her audience? Yes, indeed it does. However, the true artist is not hindered by the cruel, vague words of others. Only the true artist knows the effort put into his or her craft. Only the true artist knows when their work is complete. Should that not be satisfying enough?
No? Can you settle for no less than a series of 100% positive reviews? Well, this may border on impossible, but if you wish to please your audience, you must take them ALL into account. Certainly, you may wish to ignore some, but as an artist you have that right. However, to please others, you must listen to what ails them. If they think your movie is long and boring, make your movies shorter or more action-oriented. If they are offended when you did not wish to do so, remove the offensive material.
As for the movie, itself, I saw nothing very creative or clever in the storyline. The animation was nothing special, sprites and all. The music and sound wasn't that great, and it's not because I have any particular feelings about music from the 60's and 70's. The humor was practicaly non-existent in my opinion. The dialogue seemed like your personal rants about NG reviewers.
In my opinion, you should have kept this stuff to yourself, but it is clear many people disagree with my opinion. People that disagree with ME have put YOU on the daily Top 5 list. Is that not the beauty of Newgrounds? Is that not the beauty of the review system?